Jack's Blog

My name is Jack, you dummies

  Home :: Contact :: Syndication  :: Login
  506 Posts :: 8 Stories :: 1078 Comments :: 90 Trackbacks

Archives

Post Categories

Links

The link:  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32314240/ns/politics-cq_politics

Do the conservative outbursts help or hurt the Democratic process?

What can even be said about this?  For eight years liberals ran around shrieking at any Republican or ideological conservative they could get within shrieking range of.  The mainstream media had nothing bad to say about it.

Now, less than one year into Obama's first term, and already we're wondering if people REALLY need to have the right to free speech.  These conservatives are just disruptive.  They're false, manufactured grass roots movements.  Only liberals can have grassroots movements.  Only liberals can dissent.

Another link:  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32329508/ns/politics-white_house/?gt1=43001

Conservatives are disrupting town hall meetings.  Why, golly, it's so bad, the police are forced to remove some of them.  Fuck you.  During Bush's eight years, if a liberal gets pulled out of a public event for verbally attacking the speaker, it's fascism, Bush silencing free speech.  When a conservative gets the same treatment, it's the natural response to somebody yelling at a respected politician.

Hussain points out that when Kathleen Sebelius was confronted by angry conservatives, she gave a big shout out to free speech, and said the protestors had every right to state their mind.  So he respects her for taking the high road.  Fuck Hussain.  This is the same trick the liberals have been using since the first hints of an Obamaboner formed in their pants.  The Democrat figurehead gets to trot out, take the high ground, refuse to attack Sarah Palin's kids, refuse to silence the opposition, refuse to do the dirty work, knowing that without even having to ask them, the MSM will rush in and handle it.  They'll rake a teenager over the coals, wonder if conservatives shouldn't be silenced, etc. etc. etc.

It's just a fucking embarassment.

Says some Democrat hack douchebag:  “What’s legitimate dissent is something that provides for constructive dialogue in advancing the discussion on health insurance reform.”

Nice.  It's now up to this fuck to legitimize dissent.  I shouldn't be surprised.  This is nothing new.  Liberals have always believed that dissent was something they did.  What conservatives do is “bullying” or “attacking.”  They used to pretend that this was justified because they're the “minority” so only they can dissent.  Now that they run all of Washington, and their cronies in the MSM bully anybody that excuse is gone.  But don't worry about that.  They'll just tell you what's legitimate dissent.

Thanks guys.

posted on Friday, August 07, 2009 11:27 PM

Feedback

No comments posted yet.

Post Feedback

Title:
Name:
Url:
Comments: 
Protected by Clearscreen.SharpHIPEnter the code you see: