The link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062101518.html
Therefore, if North Korea persists in its launch preparations, the United States should immediately make clear its intention to strike and destroy the North Korean Taepodong missile before it can be launched. This could be accomplished, for example, by a cruise missile launched from a submarine carrying a high-explosive warhead. The blast would be similar to the one that killed terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in Iraq. But the effect on the Taepodong would be devastating. The multi-story, thin-skinned missile filled with high-energy fuel is itself explosive -- the U.S. airstrike would puncture the missile and probably cause it to explode. The carefully engineered test bed for North Korea's nascent nuclear missile force would be destroyed, and its attempt to retrogress to Cold War threats thwarted. There would be no damage to North Korea outside the immediate vicinity of the missile gantry.
Hey, I don't care if these guys were Clinton administration types or not. They're right. It hadn't occurred to me that we must have sat imagery of this missile, and must have very easy means of blowing it up. I suppose Clinton was never shy about firing Tomahawks at anything that offended him, so perhaps this strategy fits with his approach to military intervention, but this time around I think it's dead on.
Go to a meeting with the DPRK. Ask them how long it would take to have the missile down off the launch gantry and in storage. Tell them they have that long, plus an hour, to do so. Otherwise a Tomahawk will be on the way.
Let the protesters shriek.