The link: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9824067/
Take the following passage: “Fitzgerald may want to establish Plame had carefully protected her CIA identity as part of the process of determining whether the disclosure of her name to the news media hurt national interests.”
This is bias. It's spin. It's speculation, but it's also directed speculation. Speculation in and of itself is not necessarily a problem, but when you speculate towards a particular outcome, it reveals your bias. Let's rewrite this passage, as if we weren't hoping for indictments, and were instead simply reporting information.
“Fitzgerald may want to establish the level of care Plame took in protecting her CIA identity as part of the process of determining whether the disclosure of her name to the news media hurt national interests.”
Patrick Fitzgerald is not Ronnie Earle. He is not trying to find a way to indict somebody. He is trying to determine if any crimes worthy of indictment have been committed. His job is not to indict people. His job is to uphold the law. Writing articles that assume Rove and Libby are guilty, and that Fitzgerald's job is to indict them for something is sensationaliberalist.
That's correct, “sensationaliberalist.” It's the new word, which combines “sensationalist” which is Hussain's view of the media's primary motivation, and “liberal” which is my view of the same.